News, politics, progressive culture, music, acoustic music

Archive for the ‘Naomi Klein’ tag

Ich Bin Ein Cheesehead

without comments

The title of this post, when translated from Low German, means roughly, “I am a Wisconsinite.” I joke but in strong sympathy to the Wisconsin protesters. And I seem to have a lot of company. Good Old Ed Schultz for one.

I must confess I am only an occasional Ed Show viewer. I rarely disagree with Ed but he doesn’t know how to move the dial down form 11. When he started broadcasting from Madison at the beginning of the week, I was grateful but didn’t know if he would get much of an audience, talking to real working people, along with the usual cast of pundits and insiders. I still have no idea of Ed’s ratings this week, but it feels like his show has made a measurable contribution to the still growing support for Wisconsin labor.

Consider this snippet from The Nation’s John Nichols (shamelessly lifted from Crooks and Liars):

Nichols: Governor Walker is clearly cornered at this point. I can tell you as somebody who’s covered him for a long time. This man doesn’t want to be where he’s at. He would love to have a way out. That’s one of the reasons why the tea party is coming to town tomorrow. They’re going to rally here. They’re going to do that for a reason. And that is because they’re trying to shore the governor up.

They’re trying to scare him from backing down. The fact of the matter is these people are winning. On Thursday, these people are winning. On Thursday, they connected with the state Senate in such a powerful way that 14 Senators made the ultimate sacrifice for Wisconsinites. They went for a weekend in Illinois.

Now today, today they connected with the Assembly sufficiently that the Assembly adjourned action. These are victories each day and there’s simply no question. The power here right now is in the streets, not in the capital.

There are plenty of others of course.

Here’s Peter at Crooks and Liars:

Marginalization and dismissal are the two chief weapons of the GOP when it comes to workers and unions. But it’s kind of hard to ignore bagpipes playing in the capitol’s rotunda to the cheers of hundreds or thousands of protesters.

Imagine a small business owner talking about his or her employees in public in the manner in which the GOP speaks of government workers: “My employees are rude, pushy, demanding, overpaid, and lazy. Some of them are incompetent, but I can’t get rid of them. . . . Say, it’s almost lunchtime. I’ve got a great restaurant here — why don’t you all come by for a meal?”

Yeah, that’ll work. The employees will really respond well to a boss like that, the customers will flock in, and business will go through the roof.

Or, you know, not.

At Daily Kos, Chris Bowers has been on fire.

For those who still trust it, Huffpo has been all over the story.

I recommend this post by Digby:

Joshua Holland at Alternet has compiled all the information necessary for liberals to make the arguments about Wisconsin. (Please click the link for all the background and linkage)

And here are Naomi Klein and Chris Hayes discussing the link between Wisconsin and Klein’s Shock Doctrine:

Even people without high profile blogs are tweeting and facebooking their support. One of my facebook friends found this photo at Hullabaloo.

Egyptian Protester with Support for Wisconsin

Maybe it’s just a coincidence that people in the Middle East are rising up just as the Teabaggers are provoking some resistance in the U.S. Or maybe something big is happening.

Written by slothropia

February 19th, 2011 at 10:16 pm

Shock Doctrine in the UK

without comments

I was watching the world news on BBC America a few nights ago and the talking heads were all in agreement that the Tory government had no choice but to make draconian cuts to the UK budget. Unless they wanted to emulate Japan, which did not reduce living standards during its economic troubles in the ’90s or during the current world wide slowdown. Japan may not be paradise but it seems to be getting through the crisis as well as or better than most of the industrialized world. .

Here is George Monbiot , describing what the Coalition government in Britain is up to. This will also serve as a prediction of what the Teabag Republicans will do if they win a majority in the House of Representatives and start drafting federal budgets:

In her book The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein shows how disaster capitalism was conceived by the extreme neoliberals at the University of Chicago. These people believed that the public sphere should be eliminated, that business should be free to do as it wants, and almost all tax and social spending should be stopped. They believed that total personal freedom in a completely free market produces a perfect economy and perfect relationships. It was a utopian system as fanatical as any developed by a religious cult. And it was profoundly unpopular. For a long time its only supporters were the heads of multinational corporations and a few wackos in the US government.

In a democracy under normal conditions, those who were harmed by abandoning public provision would outvote those who gained from it. So the Chicago programme couldn’t be imposed in these circumstances. As the Chicago School’s guru, Milton Friedman, explained, “only a crisis – actual or perceived – produces real change.” After a crisis has struck, he added later, “a new administration has some six to nine months in which to achieve major changes; if it does not act decisively during that period, it will not have another such opportunity.”

The first such opportunity was provided by General Pinochet’s coup in Chile. The coup was plotted by two factions: the generals and a group of economists trained at the University of Chicago and funded by the CIA. Their ideas had already been comprehensively rejected by the electorate, but now the electorate was irrelevant: Pinochet used the crisis he had created to imprison, torture or kill anyone who dissented. The Chicago School policies – privatisation, deregulation, massive tax and spending cuts – were catastrophic. Inflation rose to 375% in 1974; the highest rate on earth. Even so, Friedman insisted that the programme was not going far or fast enough. On a visit to Chile in 1975 he persuaded Pinochet to hit much harder. The result was a massive increase in unemployment and the near-eradication of the middle class. But the very rich became much richer, and the corporations, scarcely taxed, deregulated, fattened on privatised assets, became much more powerful.

By 1982, Friedman’s prescriptions had caused a spectacular economic crash. Unemployment hit 30%; debt exploded. Pinochet sacked the Chicago economists and started re-nationalising stricken companies, whereupon the economy began to recover. Chile’s so-called economic miracle began only after Friedman’s doctrines were abandoned. The Chicago School’s catastrophic programme pushed almost half the population below the poverty line and left Chile with one of the world’s highest rates of inequality.

But all this was spun by the corporate media as a great success. With the help of successive US governments, similar programmes were imposed on dozens of countries in which crises ensured that the population was unable to resist. Other Latin American dictators copied Pinochet’s economic policies, with the help of mass disappearances, torture and killings. The poor world’s debt crisis was used by the IMF and the World Bank to impose Chicago School programmes on countries that had no option but to accept their help. The US hit Iraq with economic shock and awe – privatisation, a flat tax, massive deregulation – even as the bombs were still falling. After Hurricane Katrina wrecked New Orleans, Friedman described it as “an opportunity to radically reform the educational system”. His disciples immediately moved in, sweeping away public schools while the residents were picking up the pieces of their lives, replacing them with private charter schools.

Our crisis is less extreme, so, in the United Kingdom, the shock doctrine cannot be so widely applied. But, as David Blanchflower warned yesterday, there’s a strong possibility that the cuts programme will precipitate a bigger crisis: “it’s a terrible, terrible mistake. The sensible thing to do is to spread [the cuts] over a long time”. That’s another feature of disaster capitalism: it exacerbates the crises on which it thrives, creating its own opportunities.

Of course there is more and I invite everyone to go ZSpace and read the whole article. I would comment that South American countries like Argentina and Brazil have done relatively well since they moved left, away from Friedman’s Randian pipe dreams.

I suspect the Tories know these draconian cuts will make them unpopular, but they are willing to risk losing the next election if they are able to tie the hands of the next Labour government. Of course, the British Right have Murdoch on their side just as do the Teabaggers in the U.S. As for the Liberal Democrats, they will probably be nearly wiped out unless they somehow manage to distance themselves from Cameron and his Thatcherite policies.

Written by slothropia

October 22nd, 2010 at 10:17 am

Economic Shock Therapy

without comments

There is a good interview of Naomi Klein by John Amato at Crooks and Liars. It is mostly about the Wall Street Bailout Giveaway as economic shock therapy.

I wish Obama would check it out. Here’s the You Tube:
Part I

Part II

Written by slothropia

September 28th, 2008 at 10:20 pm

Posted in Economy

Tagged with ,

Disaster Capitalism at Work?

without comments

I am trying to get a handle on what the proposed mega Wall Street Bailout means for me and thee. There are a lot of potentially frightening implications to consider and… well that’s as far as I have gotten.

I am reading a book right now which is providing some much needed context: Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein.

Here is a 9/19 Real Time broadcast with Klein, Maher et al talking about the bailouts:

Written by slothropia

September 21st, 2008 at 7:09 pm